Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IronFlare
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 02:20, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] IronFlare
A reasonable search find that this companys only claims to Notability are: "a strategic alliance with Sun Microsystems" and the Orion Application Server, which, as a wikilink, redirects back to this company Article. I contend that this is not enough to satisfy WP's basic WP:Notability standards. I could be wrong, as I cannot read the Swedish news, but doubt any improvment is forthcomming from them as this Article has been here since March of 2005 with no Cites to them as a source so far. Whats your opinion. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 16:33, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 16:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. —Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 16:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Delete Agree with nominator that the company fails WP:CORP, based upon Google hits. Only reason for weak vote is due to potential for obscure/foreign language news articles that would establish notability, but of course if these were found the article could just be created again. Not much is lost by deleting in its current form. Richc80 (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 11:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete as this article does provide any context, content, analysis or reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
