Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iris Deactivation Code

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was merge and redirect to Iris (Stargate). —Korath (Talk) 02:04, Mar 31, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Iris Deactivation Code

Does this stub merit so much as a redirect? If Google doesn't find it notable, should we? My Magic 8-Ball answers "Outlook Not So Good", what do you think that means? Is a consensus discussion necessary to field this nomination? As I see it, this article stands no chance of becoming encyclopedic; is this clear? Discuss amongst yourselves. --GRider\^talk 17:42, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• I don't know. You tell me. Might be a merge, but since you don't want to commit on that, neither do I. Chris 01:53, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Merge into Iris (Stargate) and redirect, IMO. Bryan 17:59, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Iris (Stargate). --cesarb 18:03, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with Iris (Stargate) and redirect -- Jwinters | Talk 18:17, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or keep Gatecruft. Kappa 18:31, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the aforementioned page. Zscout370 23:06, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nn iriscruft. ComCat 01:58, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• either Keep or merge with Iris (Stargate). Megan1967 01:59, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Merge or delete, not encyclopdic on its own, Martg76 12:04, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.