Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irevna

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CSD G7 (only author requests deletion) also applies. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Irevna

Irevna (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete No sign of notability. The only sign of notability given here is that "it is a global leader in offshore equity", but there is no evidence that it is a global leader. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 13:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Speedy Delete Not asserting any notability, seems to be an easy speedy candidate. Pharmboy (talk) 13:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Provisional Delete - I've already speedied a spammier version of this article under G11 earlier today. This version isn't as biased, so I tagged it for cleanup but I agree as it stands it doesn't warrant keeping. I'm willing to accept that it may well be a notable company, and if reliable sources are added by the time the five days are up to demonstrate notability, I'll change to keep. — iridescent 13:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - The article seems to be about a genuine business or commercial establishment. True, the article looks like an advertisement but it could be rewritten and references could be added. - 14:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Personally, I'd have speedied this version had I come across it on NP patrol. But happy to give the originating editor time to find references proving notability. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 14:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Thanks, I am the originating editor of this page, a first timer at that (:-), and will certainly try my best to re-write this. In the interim, please could you delete the entire history of this, so I may write afresh after referring to how some other organisations may have done so. Ramyakrishnananil (talk) 14:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.