Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iraq Research Project
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 00:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Iraq Research Project
The page is completely original research. The article creator wants people to research aspects of the Iraq war and write about it in the article. POV, opionated, non-encyclopedic material Ozzykhan 20:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:OR, WP:NPOV and the rest of the book AlfPhotoman 21:44, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - this is simply not an encyclopedia article. -- Whpq 22:09, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete not encyclopedic, and never will be. -- Selket Talk 06:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete (although the author might want it put on their userspace first) Smmurphy(Talk) 07:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This page will no doubt be deleted (as it should) and I've taken the liberty of adding the article to a subpage I created for the article's original author. NeoFreak 16:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's awfully nice of you; however, I don't think it's a permanent solution. Wikipedia is not a personal wiki host. I think the creator should follow the instructions on that link to download the wiki software for his collaborative project, if he wants to keep it going. —Carolfrog 19:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's intended as a place holder for the information, sources and links that he has gathered, not a permanate solution to a "hosting" problem. NeoFreak 22:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- That's awfully nice of you; however, I don't think it's a permanent solution. Wikipedia is not a personal wiki host. I think the creator should follow the instructions on that link to download the wiki software for his collaborative project, if he wants to keep it going. —Carolfrog 19:53, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment This page will no doubt be deleted (as it should) and I've taken the liberty of adding the article to a subpage I created for the article's original author. NeoFreak 16:59, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
