Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ion Pachia-Tatomirescu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ion Pachia-Tatomirescu
The page, like its equivalents on the Romanian and French wikipedias, is likely the result of self-promotion. A google search will reveal that Pachia-Tatomirescu is not discussed in any reliable source: the sites mentioning him fail WP:RS by much, and many are open to any contribution - generally, as blogs (you could check out the list of links provided in the article, all of which are subject to this observation). The one reliable source I was able to find mentioning him (mentioning him) was the Bucharest University Library site, where one of his books is made available for the public, most likely as a result of his donation. No reliability, no notability, no neutrality. Dahn (talk) 17:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Emphatic delete - even overlooking the fact that the "article" is incomprehensible gibberish, this should be deleted because of the self-promoting tone and utter lack of balance and neutral third-party references. Biruitorul (talk) 21:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Dahn. Notability not established by extensive coverage in reliable sources, no evidence of any reliable secondary sources. Pete.Hurd (talk) 05:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete — notability not established. I clicked on 4 or 5 of the isbn links provided, none gives anything. In fact, searching on WorldCat, I could find only 2 books by this author: one is held only by the Library of Congress and Cambridge University, the other only by the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek in Munchen. Also, the article looks like self-promotion, it is not written in a neutral tone, and lacks reliable sources. Turgidson (talk) 12:42, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, self promotion, lacks notability.- Andrei (talk) 20:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable self promotion. --Crusio (talk) 09:07, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits 09:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
