Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invisible Green Dragon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:03, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Invisible Green Dragon

Original research and an indiscriminate collection of info whose notability is not established. The three paragraphs in this article are each talking about a different dragon, with no apparent connection between them aside from what the author of the article wanted to see. wikipediatrix 04:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete While I do see the connection the author was trying to make, it is very much original research. JoshuaZ 04:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as NN freethinker jargon. --Dhartung | Talk 07:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Smerge into The Demon-Haunted World - what little traction this concept has is a footnote of the Dragon in Carl Sagan's Garage. bd2412 T 10:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — nn Martinp23 10:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete author is clearly referring to "invisible dragon breathing heatless fire" in Carl's garage, and has got a little mixed up. Dev920 14:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge the pertinent information into the Invisible_pink_unicorn article. The phrase has enough currency that someone might possibly come look it up here, but does not have enough substance to warrant its own article outside of a mention on IPU. Arkyan 19:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I'm seeing little "currency" in the term with only 43 distinct Ghits, mostly WP mirrors. I am also unimpressed by the reference to Carl Sagan which takes the phrase out of context, taking this as a failure of WP:V. Tychocat 08:58, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.