Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inverloch (comic)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Inverloch (comic)
Another webcomic. No evidence of significant and independent publication or commentary. Delete. --Hetar 06:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- This has been listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 06:46, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I know we've had a lot of webcomic come up for AfD lately, but this one is an odd choice. I don't like Alexa, but here it serves as a good illustration. Most of the AfDed webcomics have had Alexa scores well over 100,000 -- often unranked or in the millions. Inverloch, on the other hand, has 29,822, which is good for a webcomic. Furthermore, a print edition is coming out in May from Seven Seas Entertainment, so it's not like it's self-published. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 07:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. 40,000+ Google hits, [1] #1 ranking on TopWebComics.com. [2] Feezo (Talk) 09:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: It's going to be in book form! Clearly meets the standard. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:02, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Keep: Inverloch is the number one comic in all relevant categories on topwebcomics.com.--209.102.172.207 17:40, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep, I don't believe topwebcomics is a reliable source for notability, nor is Alexa, nor are web cartoonist choice award nominations, nor is a book which hasn't been released yet -- but all of the above combined point towards keeping this article. -- Dragonfiend 16:22, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.