Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intolerant Quran verses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:15, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intolerant Quran verses

The title alone suggests that this is unsalvageably POV. It might be a copyright problem with its source also, but I brought it to AfD because I don't think the topic will work, whether or not the material is re-written. Joyous! | Talk 16:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. BhaiSaab ^talk 16:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Irredeemably POV list with little prospect of becoming an article of encyclopedic value. Oldelpaso 16:59, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Very POV and OR. -- Jeff3000 21:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as others say, for POV and OR. Might as well just go for Religious verses written when God was having an off day. William Pietri 21:52, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Will. —Khoikhoi 21:57, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete inherently POV. Camillus (talk)
• Delete or create Contradictory Bible verses. Danny Lilithborne 00:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete too much of a POV problem to be worth trying to salvage.-- danntm ^T _C 00:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Offensively POV ReverendG 02:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Well written, sourced article. Please explain this POV objection so many people have. --Pussy Galore 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - PoV, who is to say it's intolerant? HawkerTyphoon 12:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as attack page. --Mmx1 01:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete A list verses without context is just an indiscriminate collection of information or comment. This also seems to be original research. BTW There is already a Criticism of Islam article. Seano1 21:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.