Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intex

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:07, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Intex

Intex (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Prod contested by myself. I created this article from WP:AFC; my version was [1]. A subsequent editor changed it to the disambig page it is now. I'm not sure whether the Intex company in my version is notable; please decide on that before you approve deletion. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 04:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete (as the editor who posted the prod). I don't think the Intex Solutions company meets notability requirements; the best independent source I could find was this[2], and I don't think that exactly counts as serious coverage. It looks like they fail WP:ORG to me, and needless to say, so do the other companies listed on this disambiguation page. Terraxos (talk) 04:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• I agree with this - delete for these reasons.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per every disambiguated link mentioned in the article in question being invalid (no page exists for any). As mentioned above, the original article's content of a company doesn't suffice notability requirements, thus coupled with the lack of valid articles mentioned on the page, it should be deleted. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.