Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interwise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 21:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Interwise

Was tagged for speedy as "non-notable company" (and actually deleted, then listed at WP:DRV), but it's not a candidate. No opinion from me. —Cryptic (talk) 01:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Doesn't meet criteria for notability. Tom Harrison ^Talk 01:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom & tom (hey! it rhymes) Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 12:09, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Does not meet criteria. Kcordina 13:14, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tom Harrison. Ifnord 15:17, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Company is hardly non-notable, their product is a strong competitor with Microsoft NetMeeting. -- MisterHand 17:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Tom Harrison. Xoloz 19:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I've seen this company's training and conferencing products being used in a major corporate environment. I think the previous voters should try another Google search because I found many valid references. -- Netoholic @ 06:58, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: Seems notable: [1] [2][3] -- jaredwf 05:37, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Tobias Conradi (Talk) 00:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

• keep, jaredwf has established notability, no need to relist. Kappa 04:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per Tom --Eeee 06:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Reads like an advert. Atrian 06:13, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Apparently notable—tone needs work, but it's definitely salvagable. --zenohockey 06:45, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. 130 employees, it's not Microsoft but it's no tiddler, and the Chairman of its board is Jim Manzi, former Chairman, President and CEO of Lotus Development Corporation, who steered the corporation from the debacle after losing the spreadsheet market to Microsoft towards its groupware (Lotus Notes) strategy. I see no good reason to delete this article. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the Jim Manzi connection does it for me. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 14:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand - notability established by jaredwf Cactus.man ✍ 16:09, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 20:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. MAZO 20:08, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Being the one who listed it for WP:DRV while on deletion patrol - I will say that while technically short of the corp standards here it may be notable in and of itself as a project of the notable people connected to it. Another idea is just to merge the article with Jim Manzi. Anyway, I'll let the community decide. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 23:07, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.