Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interpunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kubigula (talk) 23:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Interpunk

Interpunk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't meet WP:WEB, I couldn't find any reliable, third party sources [myspace doesn't count!] that mention or review this website RichardΩ612 20:11, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete as per WP:WEB. No sign of any achievements, bands, records etc. Triwbe (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Call it a non-notable corp, or a non-notable website. Either way, Delete. Pastordavid (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, could be a speedy A7. 30 full-time employees is no indictator of Wikipedia notability at all, and third-party sources appear not to exist.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 03:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.