Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interfaith Network of UK

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 00:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Interfaith Network of UK

Interfaith Network of UK (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

I saw this in some RC patrolling, unsure of notability, wasn't sure whether to speedy. It doesn't quite assert notability to me, shows no statistics to prove it. At best, stub and clean up. DoomsDay349 23:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete for now. may be more notable in the future. google search didn't turn up much. there is an offical site which is where this article lifted all of it's text. --Tainter 23:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. It seems just on the right side of notable. The official site mentioned makes out a case for notability in that it isn't the "two men and a dog" type of organisation. One of the co-chairs is the high-profile Bishop of Southwark of "I'm the Bishop of Southwark, it's what I do" fame; his predecessor was Jim Thompson, the Bishop of Bath and Wells. The group has had some media coverage and apparently conducts its own inquiries and issues its own publications. Sam Blacketer 23:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Comment. The article should make note of these facts, as it is, it appears very unnotable. DoomsDay349 23:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - there's room for expansion, but the Network's website (added to references) makes them look notable to me. -- Bpmullins | Talk 00:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand, pops up in UK media occasionally. the wub "?!" 11:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - brand new page, give it some time for editors to contribute and assert the notability. Pastordavid 17:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.