Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intelligence Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all articles. Mailer Diablo 00:42, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Intelligence Group + (The Financial Intelligence Review PrimeZone )

Badly written article giving no reasons why this company is notable. The given webpage for the company doesn't exist and there's a copyright, all rights reserved message at the bottom! Aim Here 00:40, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

(I added two their publications,which IMO must be treated in the same way) mikka (t) 01:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless there is a substantial re-write in next few days. Batmanand 00:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. -Jcbarr 00:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Prodego ^talk 01:08, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. nonnotable yet. mikka (t) 01:09, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete All under A7: vanity, nn group. Classic walled garden / VSCA. ++Deiz 02:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable company. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 05:21, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I'll just add a vote for deleting the two articles added after I created the AfD -- Aim Here 14:49, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:43, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 02:02, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. —This user has left wikipedia 19:08 2006-02-05
• Speedy Delete on current version of The Financial and Intelligence Group: They have an "All rights reserved" that may or may not contradict agreeing to the license when editing. That poisons the entire edit, in my opinion, but there might not even be enough there to be copyrightable anyway. Maybe all these articles should be combined into one article under "Intelligence Group" or "Bziph Ltd" (which seems to be closely related) with no previously copyrighted article material. --Closeapple 21:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep on PrimeZone: it doesn't have the toxic "All rights reserved", and might be salvagable. http://www.PrimeZone.ge/ exists but is just a splash page with an internal-only link. They also seem to be related to Georgian Business Week (whose http://www.b2b.ge/ works) and Global Idea (whose http://www.globalidea.ge/ I won't navigate because it has Shockwave Flash-only links). Maybe all of these could be combined into one article. --Closeapple 21:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
  • I cleaned up PrimeZone and Georgian Business Week a bit. I haven't gotten to Intelligence Review yet, and I'm not touching the existing The Financial or Intelligence Group with a ten foot pole as long as that "All rights reserved" dooms them. --Closeapple 22:43, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.