Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instituto de empresa

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep - Joolz 00:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Instituto de empresa

Delete. The whole thing reads like an advertisement (WP:NOT violation). --IByte 18:15, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as ad unless someone can rewrite it. Gateman1997 18:49, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Keep. Reasonably notable European business school, and certainly one of the top few in southern Europe. This is a university-level institution with a pretty good pedigree; I've a feeling Novales ( the strategy guy ) is something on the faculty, and I imagine they have some notable alumni ( probably running Spanish corporations ! ). I'll try and tidy up the article to make it less like an advert ( though it's not my baby, so I'm not doing too much ! ). WMMartin 20:24, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Tidied it up a little, though I forgot to put in the Forbes' list ranking. Job for someone else, I think... :-) WMMartin 21:21, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. This is down there as one of the worst article stubs I've seen, but it was just created today (give it time) and it is a notable university-level school. If there is no content of value in a couple months, then AfD it. Cmadler 20:30, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Wikipedia:Schools/Arguments. A leading international business school. Per their page, their MBA program ranks 6th on Forbes' list of non-US MBA programs. Fact based articles are NOT advertising. This is clearly a notable school, and should be expanded, not deleted. Unfocused 20:57, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Don't just vote keep because it's a notable school. Take a look at the article and see if the content it has is worth keeping. The school may be used by the Queen of England but if it's an advert it needs to go, regardless of what it's about. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:36, 14 September 2005 (UTC)

Your comment is contrary to the deletion policy. Voting to keep is completely in line with the deletion policy if the subject is worthy of an article and if the article clearly identifies the subject and contains enough to demonstrate that it is worthy. This is obviously such a case. Unfocused 13:01, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete spam; but keep a decent rewrite. Dunc|☺ 21:00, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the rewrite. - Mgm|^(talk) 22:36, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep nice rewrite and thanks WMMartin. The original version is a copyvio [1]; someone might want to zap it. Also belongs at Instituto de Empresa Kappa 23:20, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep rewrite and move per Kappa.BillyCreamCorn 23:23, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per WMMartin --Vsion 00:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep this is a school.--Nicodemus75 05:24, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
  • See my reply to Gene Poole below. --IByte 23:29, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Appears to be a tertiary business school, and such schools are notable. If there are copyvios in the history those should be eliminated. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:49, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment, I've removed the copyvio from the history and made a note in the history explaining why the deletion tag was there. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:30, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep please we also do when they are third level schools unless something has changed but probably not Yuckfoo 07:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and please stop nominating schools. --Ryan Delaney ^talk 11:18, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Obvious bad faith nomination. Keep, and censure nominator.--Gene_poole 13:40, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Excuse me? May I remind you of the policy Wikipedia:Assume good faith? Please read the rest of the page; the page you voted on is a rewrite of what I originally nominated. This also means that my VfD was based on the way it was written, not on the mere fact that it's a school, which I thought was clearly reflected in the text of my nomination (but perhaps an {{advert}} tag would have been better). Since when is expressing your opinion on whether an article appears to comply with Wikipedia policy an "obvious bad faith nomination"?
    (and you can keep the rewrite) --IByte 23:29, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, and congratulate nominator for bringing a horrible stub to the attention of editors willing and able to make necessary improvements. -- BD2412 ^talk 23:34, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The stub for this university-level school appears to have been removed from the history, but it seems to be agreed upon in a unanimous fashion that articles about schools at this level should be unquestionably retained. Silensor 19:49, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.