Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Instant music

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was that when even the forum contributors want it gone, you know it's gotta be a deleet. Grandmasterka 05:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Instant music

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because somebody asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus amongst Wikipedia editors on whether an article is suitable for this encyclopedia. We have policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting heads (or socks).

You can participate and give your opinion. Please sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!


Vanity article for a non-notable WP:WEB forum/site. Alexa traffic rank (pirouzu.net): 1,179,445. 480 registered users. --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  03:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. -- zzuuzz (talk) 03:44, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

I'm a regular at said forum. This article's biased, inaccurate, and generally just a poor attempt at humor. Please delete it as soon as possible.--Joyeuse 03:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. I came to this article on RC patrol. After reverting the vandalism to this article, I realized that the version I reverted to wasn't much better. This article is frivolously vulgar, nearly incoherent, and only tenuously distinguished from utter nonsense. John254 04:18, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Zos 04:46, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. I don't see this article ever becoming useful or relevant. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 05:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete classic forum article fails WP:WEB and even includes the traditional attack on members' sexuality. Classic. Alphachimp talk 05:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per John254. I don't really see a need for the AfdAnon template here - we haven't seen any meatpuppets, and everyone (including the contributors to the forum) seems to agree that it should be deleted. --David Mestel(Talk) 06:50, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
    • After surviving the Eon8 AFD, I just don't risk it when nominating forums these days. = ) --  Netsnipe  (Talk)  10:08, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 07:26, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete and spank their little bums! SilkTork 13:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.