Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inside Moves

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was

[edit] Inside Moves

As the article says, it's a "nearly unknown movie". And this article is nothing but a spoiler (and a cast list). Uncle G 11:23, 2005 Jan 12 (UTC)

• Delete, nothing much going on. Inter 12:13, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no useful content. Speedy material in my opinion. Mgm|^(talk) 13:32, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This needed cleanup, not deletion. Xezbeth 15:16, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. I agree with Xezbeth. It's notable enough, and it's on IMDB here. --Deathphoenix 17:33, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
  • Being listed on IMDB is not per se evidence of notability (although IMDB is a reasonably good first-stage filter for non-notability). Moreover, Wikipedia is not an IMDB mirror. Uncle G 19:49, 2005 Jan 14 (UTC)
• Keep, cleanup would help. Wyss 23:02, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Cleanup. Definitely not speedy material. One of my favorite movies. RickK 00:25, Jan 13, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Academy Award nominee (Best Supporting Actress, as explained in the cleaned-up article now.) Samaritan 21:30, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - notable film, though it could use some expansion. The "nearly unknown" comment is incorrect, however I see that's been removed. 23skidoo 07:18, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - I find it a notable film a cult film of a few as the imdb entry comments show. vaceituno 13:58, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. For the umpteenth time, VfD is not cleanup. GRider\^talk 23:36, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.