Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insensiives 9-11

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was (SPEEDY) DELETE. Essjay · Talk 07:23, August 4, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Insensiives 9-11

Fiction. Denni☯ 20:53, 2005 July 30 (UTC)

• Delete Huh? --malathion ^talk 21:14, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WTF! I believe the nonsense tag would've been applicable here. - Thatdog 21:24, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - or speedy delete like all the other nonsense/hoaxes by that IP andy 21:49, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Actually, no, they have to go through VfD. Wikipedia:Patent nonsense says that "while regrettable", hoaxes are not nonsense, and Wikipedia:Deletion policy is clear that hoaxes must be processed through VfD. While I wish stuff like this was speediable, fact is if you are going to follow the party line, it's not. Just doing my job. Denni☯ 22:08, 2005 July 30 (UTC)
• Delete drini ☎ 22:13, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Pile of crap 80.42.28.76 22:15, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete article without sufficient context to make sense. Probably about a nn character in fanfic, but who can tell? Robert A West 22:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete unintelligible gibberish - if this isn't patent nonsense, them I'm French --Doc (?) 00:03, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete. Utter nonsense. 23skidoo 01:36, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy nonsense. --Etacar11 03:08, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete... can't even spell. Mmmbeer 01:07, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.