Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Innopharm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was spam - but don't belittle the Hormel corporation. DS 18:36, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Innopharm

That stuff that Hormel makes. Formerly prodded and "cleaned up" by changing the original "Our company does blah blah..." to "Innopharm does blah blah..." Created by User:Innopharm, who has no other contributions. Please, speedy criterion for blatant advertising? Opabinia regalis 05:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, vanispamcruftisement. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete quite an intersting phenomenon but this article is just an ad Dlyons493 Talk 07:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spam spam spam eggs bacon and spam. Probably a copyvio too—the intro is, but I couldn't find the main page.--Fuhghettaboutit 07:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:SPAM. HumbleGod 07:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, as per above, also, it's a copyvio from this page and other pages on the website. It's easier to take something to copyright problems than AfD, so you should do that if you know that it is a copyvio (I guess it wasn't in this case). Also, if it looks like a copyvio, you could try to find it. Since the nomination has already had a fair amount of participation, I suggest that it be speedy closed rather than being taken to copyright problems now. -- Kjkolb 09:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: wobbly pink cuboid. Clinical trials, eh? Did you know that TeGenero has filed for insolvency? --die Baumfabrik 10:09, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:CORP, WP:WEB & WP:SPAM DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP} 14:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Coredesat. Danny Lilithborne 23:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.