Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InkLink

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 00:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] InkLink

No obvious notability. Overly longstanding need for cleanup. Ben Aveling 11:05, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. I've heard and played the game. It gets several thousand hits on Google. To me, that's notable. Halo 11:25, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep for 95,400 hits with main web page here [1]. It exists, verified, notable. Nuff said. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 11:44, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Most of those are for a different InkLink. (Seiko Instruments USA Inc. - InkLink) InkLink + game gets about 25,000 hits, mostly but not all for the InkLink game, and most of those seems to be sites that have a copy of every free shockwave game known to mankind. Ben Aveling 19:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• I've got no idea how to determine the notability of a Shockwave game, but the tricks section needs to go. It tells there's tricks but doesn't explain them. So they're bare of info. - Mgm|^(talk) 20:43, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. I'm not sure of the notability, or what the criteria for games ought to be, but it seems marginally notable at least. *Dan T.* 04:35, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep per Dtobias. Stifle 15:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.