Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inimica vis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Inimica vis

Inimica vis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

An unremarkable event in history. In nearly two years since this page was created there has been not one citation. Fails N. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 14:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment. I can certainly find the text of this online, but I haven't yet found any sources that cover the subject itself. Needs attention from an expert on the subject - ie someone other than me.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: I've notified the author. The article gives a link to the text or letter. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 14:17, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Papal Encyclicals are inherently verifiable, sourced, and significant. Although Papal Encyclicals haven't always been the second-most important type of communication sent out by Popes, they have always been public communications between important figures in the Roman Catholic church, usually relating to theological matters. --Oldak Quill 15:22, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep It's still quoted, it's important in both relations with the post risorgiomento Italian state and Freemasonry. Picking on Papal Encyclical is a bit odd, and I would agree with Oldak that they are inherently verifiable, sourced, and significant. However even if this is not accepted it shouldn't be this encyclical. JASpencer (talk) 17:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep major historical topic. This one is certainly notable, but i'd even say that all papal encyclicals are covered in multiple sources, and I think every one of them would be notable hereDGG (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC).
  • Note The same nominator has also put up Custodi di quella fede for deletion, so people may want to also put comments there. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Custodi di quella fede JASpencer (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - Papal encyclicals are almost all inherently notable, as per similar statements above. Almost all have received significant contemporary coverage, and most if not all are regularly referred to in church history and/or theological documents. John Carter (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.