Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inhabitat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 23:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Inhabitat

Inhabitat (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Pulled this out of speedy after a polite, reasoned e-mail from the creator. I take the point of the speedy nominator but think AfD is more appropriate, especially given available evidence of notability. Dppowell 03:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Keep Modified the copy to align it more with the guidelines and conventions of Wikipedia. Added additional industry references and an additional trade journal reference to help establish and support credibility and notability. Please advise if there are other problematic sections of copy that need editing. Please compare this entry with existing Wikipedia entry Worldchanging as both organizations are very similar in nature and notability. Marc Alt 9:55 EST 9 November 2007

• Keep. The media mentions do it for me. --Gwern (contribs) 21:40 9 November 2007 (GMT)
• Keep, sufficient coverage in independent sources for notability. Needs to be rewritten to be less spammy and with correct citation style. --Dhartung | Talk 22:12, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.