Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Infant Sorrow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Infant Sorrow
lack of explanation or notability Djdickmutt 19:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for lack of context, lack of purpose and being lackadaisical. Is Wikipedia now becoming a poetry anthology? Eddie.willers 20:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. ChaosAkita 21:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- It looks like a William Blake poem. It's already on wikisource:Infant Sorrow, so we should just delete it here. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:19, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as above. Springnuts 20:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The "analysis" is WP:OR and the rest of the article is just text copied from a published author. Suriel1981 23:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
