Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inertia (laziness)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inertia (laziness)

Hardly a potential article. Currently presents just a single quotation. ☢ Ҡi∊ff⌇↯ 02:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete it is a potential article... on wiktionary. - Richardcavell 03:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, violates WP:NOT. Michael 06:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Richardcavell. Viridae^Talk 08:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Do not transwiki, as this definition is already on Wiktionary. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 10:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Richardcavell and Cordesat above. Localzuk ^(talk) 14:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete without transwikiing per User:Coredesat. JIP | Talk 15:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.