Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ineedhits (2nd Nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 06:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ineedhits

Procedural nomination out of my continued efforts to clean up Australian corpcruft. Article previously the subject of an AfD which was closed on 7 July 2005 as no consensus. Article fails WP:CORP entirely, and had it not been the fact it had previously gone no consensus at AfD I would have marked the article as CSD A7/G11 and been done with it. The article clearly is for a non-notable local company written solely for the purpose of self-promotion, and has all the hallmarks of WP:VSCA. Additionally, the previous nomination noted potential WP:COI issues arising from the user who has significantly contributed to the article (User:ClayCook) being an employee or directly connected with the article's subject. Clay Cook according to the article is the founder of the company, and the has made few edits to WP outside this article and relevant topics (Has not edited since 2 July 2005). The article lacks WP:RS to back up any of the information included within. Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Thewinchester ^(talk) 14:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete the site asserts awards but --as far as I can see-- does not list them; a seo is not easy to search for, and I've so far found no awards. Possible keep if there is some documentation available.DGG 15:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete agree with above. No reliable and independent secondary sources, therefore not notable. Assize 11:48, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as above Recurring dreams 23:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.