Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indidginus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete, with no prejudice towards future notability. Kurykh 00:49, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Indidginus
Fails WP:MUSIC and WP:N. No sources, no recordings released on a major or top indie label, article written by the subject (he admitted this in another AfD). Realkyhick 19:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR, WP:COI, and also per nom. GreenJoe 19:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above and per nom •Malinaccier• T/C 19:15, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Associated with some notable acts, but these do not make him notable alone.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:40, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what sources to use to prove that I am not lying. Google search provides a few links from third parties. In terms of releases, what is a major label where electronic music is concerned? Most labels who release psybient only have a couple of thousand CDs pressed at most in a run. And yes, the article was written by me. I have freely stated that. If working with The Orb & The Shamen doesn't qualify me to have a small music-related article on Wikipedia, then I'm not sure what does. Enjoy your week & do what you must. Michael. Mike Indidginus 12:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- We're not really questioning your truthfulness, but the sources are needed to verify your notability, which is a fancy way of saying, "Is this subject important enough to merit an article?" Merely existing as a musician does not qualify you for an article. Additionally, writing an article about yourself makes the article look like self-promotion, which is another no-no at Wikipedia. Realkyhick 16:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
