Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. As the nomination doesn't even mention what misinformation is about, and it would need over 50 deletes in order to sawy the outcome, I'm closing this one earlier. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 03:16, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Indian Institute of Management Calcutta

Misinformation

• Keep "so fix it" Zeimusu | Talk page 13:01, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. There's no misinformation ther. I went through it pretty well.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 13:02, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep i don't quite see what is wrong with the article. If there are mistaken facts there: correct them. Chelman 13:04, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Seems fine to me. As said before, if you know better - fix it. Also, you should sign your entries. PJM 13:19, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep be bold & fix. Youngamerican 13:30, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Very bad nomination. An institute of repute with famous alumni. I cant see the minsinformation. In any case, not criteria for deltion. Lot of work going on to improve the site. See the discussion page. STRONG KEEP Prashanthns 14:18, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. AFD is not cleanup, subject is a notable established university. flowersofnight 15:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• If you think there's misinformation in this, fix it yourself, hash it out on the talk page or take it to cleanup. This is a misuse of AfD. Jacqui ^{*2 15:18, 31 October 2005 (UTC)}
• Keep as above. Some sentences are in advertisement style (e.g., the vision of the institute...) but this should be noted with the POV tag, not by listing the article for deletion. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 16:35, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep It is POV and/or needs globalized perspective, but definitely no delete.doles 17:31, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep One of the top educational institutions in India. Bad faith nomination. Tintin 17:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep- one of the best business schools of this part of the world. Contents shall get modified gradually over a period of time. --Bhadani 17:35, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - Can't the keep be speedied ? This is almost as bad as nominating Harvard or Yale for AfD. Tintin 17:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep: The nomination itself is ridiculous. --Ragib 18:51, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Tertiary institutions are generally accepted to be notable. We have had no delete votes other than the anon nominator and plenty of keeps and speedy keeps so this vote should be wrapped up early. Capitalistroadster 23:10, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, under assumption that nom believed AfD to be cleanup. Jkelly 00:55, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Problem is, nominations like this encourage more of the same.--Nicodemus75 01:15, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep - Inappropriate/mistaken use of AFD. --rob 01:31, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.