Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indiafinest

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Indiafinest

Contested PROD. Delete due to no evidence of meeting WP:WEB; appears to be WP:SPAM. No WP:RS indicating notability, only 122 registered members from site stats. --Kinu ^t/_c 22:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I endorsed the original prod. It's a non-notable forum (per nom). alphaChimp^(talk) 23:34, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Utterly fails WP:WEB. Less notable than my online collection of kitten pics. My Alt Account 00:05, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. VegaDark 00:37, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.-- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 10:08, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - Aksi_great (talk) 20:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Thoroughly non-notable. Doesn't even have an Alexa ranking at all. Geoffrey Spear 00:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello mods, All your comments seem like you all are just for passtime here. Whatever your comments on my non-noticable forum are, i dont care. But according to wiki system, my entry is actuallky valid, because my entry is a real entity, maybe its new and starting right now, but its more real them much of listings here on wikipedia.

Please remember its not DMOZ or a directory listing its a wiki, you control here so that no fake content comes here, But dont try to make this your personal liking, and nobody cares if my article is listed here or not, even me myself.

• Comment - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Content must be encyclopedic, and must conform to Wikipedia policies, particularly, in this case, the guidelines for notability. Please read WP:WEB. The fact that this is a wiki, which allows anyone to edit, does not imply that any edit is automatically permissible. You may think that this conflicts with the "Wiki Way", but the consensus of the memebers of the community agrees with the rules as they're written. Geoffrey Spear 13:33, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; endorsing the above comment, --Gurubrahma 13:46, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

  Well it makes me amaze, how you people wrote about a true entity.

  @GeoffSpear : It has an alexa rank, check Yourself, maybe its not as good, but it exists on alexa.

  @one_who_has_online_kitten_pics_website : If your kitten pics actually attract more traffic then indiafinest.com, i.e. 400+uniques and 14000+ pageviews daily, I am ready to close indiafinest.com now.

  @All who say its not compliant to WP:WEB, I dont see even a single reason why it is not compliant, Its a new community but its for real. Its not popular in certain group of people living outside india and soon it will pick up with many more things.

  Its not WP:SPAM at all, If you have evidence, please let me know. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiafinest (talk • contribs) 23:12, 12 September 2006

  You're correct. It's gone from having no Alexa ranking to a ranking around 2 million in the past few days. This doesn't come close to meeting the standards in WP:WEB. Geoffrey Spear 22:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Ok i went to this website, there are about 200 users, with barely half of them having made no contribution. The other half have an average about 10-15 comments each. Compare that with the Indiatimes blog, and you have 1000's of members with more than one lakh blog topics itself.--Ageo020 18:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

  ^ Well you yourself saw the website, its an active community, being a clean and a complete attempt to make a dedicated community. What you pointed about users is true, we do have active and loyal users, and the facts you provided about posts is actually we have 4200+ messages in total. We are a 44 days old community of users came from various other forums and collectively worked here in IndiaFinest.

  I doubt a lot why you compare with indiatimes community, They are different people with different aims, we are here for different purpose, Indiatimes blog is none of our category and they are highly commercialised people, But we are here not for any commercial purpose. I claim IndiaFinest community may have less usres and less messages, But i am sure we win when compared to indiatimes community in moral values, in culture values and we are NOT here to compromise with indian culture values, like all commercialised ventures do. To sum up, if you compare us with size, then I have a point that we are going through exceptional growth per day. And If you point content quality and vision, I must say we are the winner, because we are here only for quality community. I hope comparing an cultural community with a commercial one, and with least moral/cultural values one is not a good comparison, Because we are winner in both paces with good growth, and good quality. So i dont think anybody can think this article is amy sort of WP:SPAM category, because we are for real, we have clear objective and we DO have something to work on dedicatedly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Indiafinest (talk • contribs) 19:46, 13 September 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.