Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Independent Lens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 11:03, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Independent Lens

Was marked as a speedy, but I preferred to bring it here. Physchim62 (talk) 23:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment I saw the article show up on speedy, so added what is currently there for the reason Dysepsion mentioned above. It may not be a popular series, but it is notable in its particular focus. The article could use some elaboration though, maybe a list of notable documentaries/film makers they have covered. --Dawson 00:23, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep – It's a weekly show on PBS. Good job on the stub, Dawson. ×Meegs 01:25, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notable (awards), reasonably well known to PBS viewers. Georgewilliamherbert 02:12, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Definitely notable. --Allen 06:32, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per above. -- Krash (Talk) 13:57, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Weekly shows are notable Ruby 14:52, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep One of the best shows on PBS! --Bigarlo609 01:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep It's notable and of some importance. The article needs work, though. I'm still uncertain as to for what reason this article even came up for deletion. REwhite 03:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep It is a notable PBS show. The original reason it was put up for speedy delete was because it was previously only a one sentence article without any sources, so naturally someone who had never seen the show would jump to conclusions. However, if the person who put up the delete tag is watching this next time please try and look it up on a search engine before deleting it. If you did, you would have seen that all it needed was a clean-up tag and not a deletion tag. Thank you.-Jersey Devil 03:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.