Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inbox diet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Inbox diet

Nothing but pure advertisement. Seriously, can anyone defend this? ReverendG 04:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete this spam for spam-prevention. OMGadverthack... LinaMishima 04:39, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete - WP:SPAM Fabricationary 04:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Being the first free C/R system is an assertion to notability, but one that's not confirmed by google: [1] [2], nor by their nonexistent website. Totally fails WP:V.--Kchase T 05:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Empty calories. -- Vary | Talk 06:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Digest per above. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 03:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Why is it still there? ReverendG 21:52, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Because none of the speedy deletion criteria are met. Wikipedia:Guide to deletion#Deletion_process Uncle G 02:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (obvious) LactoseTI 23:36, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - spam, spam, spam, eggs, and spam. - Richardcavell 02:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Wait!!! Maybe it could be merg... Ha! Just kidding! Nuke it off our plane of existence. --Xrblsnggt 02:09, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam^spam -- Deville (Talk) 02:26, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.