The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was consensus to delete. Johnleemk | Talk 10:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
non-enclopediatic, belongs in a dictionary MAYBE.... Delete-- VileRage(Reply|C|Spam Me!*) 05:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete as per nom. Oyvind 08:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Stifle 11:44, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete definition is inaccurate as well. Subject is already covered in a cappella. —Wahoofive (talk) 17:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete unverifiable --Bachrach44 22:10, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.