Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In a world

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --23:31, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] In a world

Delete Non-encyclopedic PhilipO 06:23, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

• delete absolutely Non-encyclopedic. Doesn't quite qualify for a speedy, but i wish it did. DES ^(talk) 06:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. One sentence, and bsolutely nothing further to say about the subject. Isomorphic 06:53, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per DESiegel and that wikipedia is not a list of phrases. --Apyule 07:20, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Less than a dicdef. ManoaChild 08:52, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Less than a sub-substub. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:56, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for inanity. --Agamemnon2 10:56, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete second inanity, second wishing it qualified for speedy. --KillerChihuahua 14:06, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as is. But this could absolutely be a legitimate article. I may even rewrite the article just to spite the deletionists. :) (Although the title should probably be something like "In a world where...".) RADICALBENDER★ 14:37, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • I can't of anything to include in such an article. What would you include if you ever rewrote it? - Mgm|^(talk) 10:08, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
• In a world where Wikipedia was a collection of catch phrases, this article would not deserve to be deleted. Sdedeo 18:45, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Don LaFontaine or Trailer (movie). Caerwine Caerwine 17:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.