Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/InVANET
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge. —Random832 15:14, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] InVANET
A duplicate article exists - Intelligent Vehicular AdHoc Network E_dog95 Hi 07:14, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge - clear case. Both articles were started by the same user Netresearchlabs (talk · contribs) within a minute, but not as duplicates. Lars T. 01:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Yes. The articles share the same author. It's clear to me these articles are related; they use the same terms. It could be said that they're saying the same type of things which, as it turns out, is not much. Both pages have a lack of notability. So ...these get merged. Then what do we have? An article that still doesn't qualify as encyclopedia material with no notability or references.
- Look it up - (wp gwp g | eb 1911 co en gct sw) E_dog95 Hi 05:44, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh 05:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~Eliz81(C) 10:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete or merge if it has anything not already in the other article. Collectonian (talk) 16:34, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and delete. Add any useful information or sources to Intelligent Vehicular AdHoc Network --S.dedalus 00:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.