Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulsiveness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Kubigula (talk) 05:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Impulsiveness

Impulsiveness (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Originally a speedy A1, this was contested by the author so I'm putting this to AfD for consensus - no vote. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 15:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. This is a valid stub. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 15:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Valid stub, the article creator saw a gap in Wikipedia and tried to fill it, as he explains. Bláthnaid 16:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • The only real problem I have with it is that it's a short dicdef-type article - and may thus be difficult to expand on without original research.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 17:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Believe me, there is plenty of stuff about impulsiveness out there. --Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 17:23, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - given the poor shape of Wikipedia articles on psychology, it seems counterproductive to have more unsourced dictionary-definition stubs that will more than likely just become dumping grounds for original research. - Chardish 17:46, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep: its a valid stub, but could use a source ZyMOS 06:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. Chardish seeems to be arguing to get rid of this because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, which is quite original. However, we have WikiProjects to fix up such stubby articles. Bearian 00:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Bearian, they have taken the text from my fingers. It is a valid stub.Earthdirt (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.