Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impulse (band)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 23:57, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Impulse (band)

Non-notable band vanity. JDoorjam 19:39, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete -- doesn't appear to be notable enough to warrant inclusion. No major releases. - Longhair | Talk 19:42, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete + indefban creator. Erwin Walsh
  • ban the creator? That's completely unjustified. JDoorjam 19:57, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

Why? Erwin Walsh

You explain why this user should be banned. Hopefully you can get the words out before you yourself are banned. (That's a helluva talk page you got going there, Erwin!) JDoorjam 21:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. This article addresses a legitimate item. After all, the band has its own website. Great work! --StevenL 21:23, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Respectfully, having one's own website is neither necessary nor sufficient to be considered notable. JDoorjam 22:48, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability asserted under WP:Music. Allmusic.com doesn't have an article on them although there are two bands called Impulse listed there. One is an electronica outfit with two records on K7 records and a rock band that released an album on MicMac Records in 1995. Capitalistroadster 00:25, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.