Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial blues

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. dbenbenn | talk 23:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Imperial blues

Non-notable band that has been here since April. Google only reveals 119 hits [1], a lot of which is from guess what - Wikipedia mirror sites. Delete. -- Elle vécut heureusement _{toujours dorénavant} (Be eudaimonic!) 05:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable musical group. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-03 06:46Z
• Delete not speedyable though Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 08:21, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• keep: Lots of interest from contributors, plus I'm in favour of creating some kind of technology-based filtering instead of deletion for non-notability-- Marvin147 09:43, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

You may think that, but is there any reliable outside source about this? Does it meet any of the music guidelines. If we were to allow any band, Wikipedia would turn into a band advertising hotspot. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- Rob 08:32, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - doesn't seem notable. David Johnson [T|C] 19:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, agree wholeheartedly with Mgm. Dan 19:02, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. NeoJustin 00:05, January 4, 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.