Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imperial Coalitionism

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:46, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Imperial_Coalitionism

I realize this page has been around since December, and a number of editors have looked at it. But - 1. - a combined Google/Yahoo search netted a total of 5 (five!) hits, 4 of which are Wikipedia mirrors. This [1] appears to be the only independent site using this term, and it is an exact copy of the original Wikipedia article. 2. - Based on these results, I'm pretty certain that this term is some individual's neologism for the early Imperial Roman system of government. It seems to have no wider usage anywhere. 3. - not linked to by any other page on Wikipedia. I think it should be deleted as a result, but I'll be happy if someone can show me I'm wrong. -- Dcfleck 14:50, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)

• Delete. Neologism. -- Mwanner 16:29, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Delete: not entirely convinced that it's a neologism, although the evidence does point that way; if it is, then definitely delete. Avocado 16:59, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: entirely convinced that it's a neologism/original research. FreplySpang (talk) 20:15, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I want journal citations, or else this should be deleted as a neologism. Average Earthman 20:47, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.