The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:58, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
This art movement is "burgeoning" 21st century art movement. There is only another encyclopedia as a resource; further reliable sources are needed. Gay Cdn(talk)(email)(Contr.) 01:48, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. I notice it was also prodded as vanity; I agree with that too. Wikipedia is not for articles about art movements you make up yourself. lol -IceCreamAntisocial 05:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom Akradecki 17:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. —ExplorerCDT 02:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.