Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immedium

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 02:41, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Immedium

This looks non-notable - like a contact page for a company. Anabanana459 06:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as advertising. Blnguyen 06:48, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, ditto. See also Mark Graham for an associated deletion candidate Ianb 09:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per advertising. -- Jjjsixsix ^(talk)/_(contribs) @ 20:47, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

how is it any different from wiki entries such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avalanche_Press http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediatpress http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partisan_Press http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pariah_Press

and many other wikipedia printing press entries. The article is not advertising. It instead maps out the organizational structure of the press. 19 January 2006 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.163.124.201 (talk • contribs)

• Speedy Delete per CSD A8 [1] --NaconKantari 21:16, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "emerging" = yet to emerge. Unencyclopaedic in tone, no evidence of meeting WP:CORP or WP:WTH. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 15:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
• We've missed the speedy deletion deadline (please, when you vote speedy delete on an article, tag it with {{db}} and the reason after a |. Delete for now, per JzG. Stifle 00:21, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.