Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iman Wilkens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Where Troy Once Stood - Yomangani^talk 23:27, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Iman Wilkens

An author whose books are asserted to be much sought-after, but who nonetheless manages to score less than 600 Google hits, of which about 150 are uniue and none appear to be neutral authorities for a biography. Guy 22:29, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. I think Wilkens' book is notable enough to have an article, which is at Where Troy Once Stood. However, Wilkens is only know for this book, and is not notable otherwise. Any information in this article that's not in Where Troy Once Stood should be merged there, and this article should be deleted. --Akhilleus (talk) 23:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Agree with above--info on author can be added to book article. Glendoremus
• Delete - as per nom Naturenet | Talk 07:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as suggested above (and thus keep, since merge and delete is not allowed by the GFDL). --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 07:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't think his book is notable enough for an article, and the absence of sources make him even less suitable for inclusion. So no merge for me. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:03, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as suggested above.Antiphus 18:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to the book. Otherwise, just keep and weed the crap out.--Cúchullain ^t/c 05:14, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.