Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Illustrated fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Illustrated fiction

Illustrated fiction (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

In addition to the wonderful sentence in the article, illustrated fiction is also a dicdef and belongs at wiktionary, if anywhere. Travellingcari (talk) 20:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• Keep I'm sure this could be expanded with some effort, using sources like this, this, this, this, this, etc. Seems like historians and literary critics have written extensively about the subject. Zagalejo^^^ 22:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep easily expandable stub. DGG (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per above. I will expand this article, but I probably won't have time to do this until after the AfD closes. Bláthnaid 15:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.