Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ignominious

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete (transwikied by someone else). – ugen64 01:48, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ignominious

Dictionary definition, already transwikied, not an encyclopedic concept, no potential that I can see. Kappa 21:29, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete You 21:57, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete transwiki'd dictdef. Wikibofh 22:06, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Dictdef already transwikied. Besides, Kappa never nominates articles for deletion which should not be deleted. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:41, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• (Sorry, Kappa.) The adjective→noun redirect would be to ignominy. We don't have that. But we do have something else. Redirect to shame. Uncle G 19:51, 2005 Jun 3 (UTC)
  • I (mildly) oppose redirection to places that don't mention the word in question. Kappa 20:48, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.