Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Idiotic Robots

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  11:46, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Idiotic Robots

Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --Czj 22:10, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Also fails Verifiability, Vanispamcruftisment (sp?). Key phrases: "Written by Luke Lasley as a way to entertain himself and his friends", "Although it is unclear just how Idiotic Robots came to be" and "Of these 24 comics only eight have been made, and it is likely that the last sixteen will never be put into production". No web link. - Richfife 22:25, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete non-notable, unverifiable, made up at school, cruft, etc.... --Wafulz 22:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete: "Written by Luke Lasley as a way to entertain himself and his friends" ... yeah, that's about as noteable as pocket lint. --Dennette 22:41, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - unless some references appear very soon. Spelling suggests not much time was spent working on this article. Gimmetrow 00:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• But... but... It is currently spreding into several schools throughout the Nashville area!!! Oh wait, yeah. Delete as non-notable, WP:NFT, suspected WP:VANITY, WP:V, yada yada. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NFT. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 ^{talk contribs Email} 05:59, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wryspy 07:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.