Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideazon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Navou banter / contribs 03:17, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ideazon

Ideazon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable gaming products company. Article(s) on products have been previously deleted as spam. No independent sources. Drat (Talk) 09:18, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep (or merge into Zboard). Plenty of hits including these ones from news.google.com. Mathmo Talk 10:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I believe the articles Zboard and MERC should be merged with and redirected to Ideazon. They are not notable enough for their own articles. This means that it is not necessary to wiki-link the rest of the products (with uncreated articles) and others like ZEngine. - Anas Talk? 13:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I know this page is alittle lame, but it does talk about the history of the creator and the company. I dont have any of their products but being an avid gamer, I feel that Ideazon is a great and inovative company and I would like to start expanding the Ideazon page soon. Hurleyman 02:25, 11 February 2007
  • Keep this company is quite notable. Enough sources to assert its notability are in the article's talk page. I started the article about five months ago. - Anas Talk? 11:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep even though I'm not convinced of their notability, and I'm not sure the Google News ones above count. The article has no external references other than the corporate website. However, Zboard and MERC should definitely be merged. --Chris 16:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Updates are on the way. These things don't write themselves in one day. Hurleyman 11-Feb-07
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.