Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideas (retailer)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a shonky merge and redirect. Daniel 09:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ideas (retailer)

Ideas (retailer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable company per WP:CORP, consists of nothing but marketing-speak. I speedy deleted under G11 but after a complaint, I agreed to overturn and bring here. Mangojuicetalk 21:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge into Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Limited ... there is no WP:A to establish WP:N for an article of its own ... a phrase like "Flagship store" implies that they have more than one outlet, but their own website says it's the only one ... WP:VSCA, pure and simple. —72.75.73.158 (talk · contribs) 22:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:02, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Please see Talk:Ideas (retailer) for how the CSD became this AfD. —68.239.79.82 13:54, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge sourced information as appropriate per User:Mangojuice. Not enough WP:RS for a standalone article, and would be better treated from a WP:CORP-compliant perspective as a subsection of the company's article. --Kinu t/c 05:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
  • merge into Gul Ahmed Textile Mills Limited as suggested above. I don't like coming down hard on topics from non-English-speaking countries, since that usually would be an instance of English cultural bias - but in this case, nobody has provided significant references to make this article strong enough to stand on its own, and since it's a for-profit business I'm not particularly interested in seeing the rules bent for this article. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 22:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.