Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideal Medical Practice

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 00:11, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ideal Medical Practice

Ideal Medical Practice (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism for a theory of health care delivery mainly espoused by one author. No secondary sources supporting this particular concept. Delete, unencyclopedic. JFW | T@lk 23:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Per WP:NEO -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete spamtastic. JuJube (talk) 07:47, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 09:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. Although it reads in an unencyclopaedic way and needs inline citations, there are independent sources that attest to the concept, such as this site and a book from the JAMA. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 23:50, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
    • The AMA book is not about the concept Ideal Medical Practice. It just has a chapter titled that way. The website is, well, a website... JFW | T@lk 00:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Oh, Gordon Moore is the subject of a Wall Street Journal article. How nice. But it is still Gordon Moore's show. JFW | T@lk 00:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete pure spam RogueNinjatalk 08:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - nothing new in the concept, just coining new term. Triage, medical software programs, Electronic medical records etc. already exist. Mattisse 22:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.