Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icy Hot
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:53, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Icy Hot
Commercial trademark of non-notable product Alex.tan 07:01, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup - Major commercial product advertised nationally, but article needs improvement. --FCYTravis 08:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep & Cleanup – per FCYTravis. —Kjammer 10:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep & Cleanup – per FCYTravis. -ÅfÇ++ 11:00, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and let it get expanded. A well known product that I think might qualify as a part of Americana simply because of the humor of the name. Wikibofh 14:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep: I hate our efforts at becoming Brandapedia, but we've already started it. No reason to delete this at this point, alas. Geogre 14:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I think that's mostly a good thing, though. Even brands that are literally household words are surprisingly tough to find good information on that isn't written by someone who's either employed by the company or otherwise trying to sell/promote it. We could fill a truly valuable niche by presenting information not easily available elsewhere. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:24, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Complete agreement with Mr. Lenahan. Just because we list products doesn't mean we have to say only nice things about them - and every notable product comes with notable criticisms. -- BD2412 talk 21:18, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)
- I think that's mostly a good thing, though. Even brands that are literally household words are surprisingly tough to find good information on that isn't written by someone who's either employed by the company or otherwise trying to sell/promote it. We could fill a truly valuable niche by presenting information not easily available elsewhere. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:24, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- keep and fix it. Articles on famous products are interesting. Brighterorange 15:48, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Notable product. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:24, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep and continue efforts to build an NPOV brandipedia. Kappa 21:23, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, Notable enough. K1Bond007 22:02, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Concur with George. Also, he created a good neologism toward an encyclopedia for brand names. --SuperDude 15:48, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep, notable product.Gateman1997 18:24, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
