Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ice Nine Kills

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Tiptoety talk 04:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ice Nine Kills

Ice Nine Kills (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Here per request of editor responding to request at AfC. Has some sources but may not be reliable enough to pass WP:MUSIC. So, after he put {{hangon}} and myself and another user discussed it with him, we agreed to take it here and let the community decide. Daniel Case (talk) 22:52, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete Only claim to fame is their myspace page, Purevolume, and smartpunk. Since those are not exactly the most influential and credible sources, I'm afraid a delete is in order. Jmlk17 22:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete Seems to fall just a bit short. Some of the sources look borderline, but they don't look like they're quite there yet. If the album were on a major label I might go towards weak keep. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:58, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete It does not pass WP:MUSIC. The sources are improperly sourced and the band in itself is not notable as per the what the heck is this ensemble. Has no gold records and no songs on the top 100 charts. Therefore, it is not notable. Razorflame 23:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:MUSIC.  Esradekan Gibb  "Talk" 04:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.