Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IcePhantomon

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:41, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] IcePhantomon

Hoax article. Said digimon does not exist. Google search comes up with absolutely nothing. A reliable source for digimon information, the shining evolution encyclopdia doesn't have this digimon. There are also no versions of Phantomon that have IcePhantomon has an english alternative name. Digimon also does not exist on this list.

The image used on the article is apparently self-made by User:Pjpatron. Which seems sort of suspicious. Suspicious as in either the person's lying about the image license, or the image is self-made, along with the digimon. `/aksha 06:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. -- Ned Scott 07:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • {{db-nonsense}} it.-- Chris chat edits essays 11:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, and does anyone else find it strange that we don't apply the same strict notability criteria to fictional characters as we do to real people? Akradecki 15:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ZynZyn 18:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per 0 Google hits and non-existance. Punkmorten 21:17, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not real. People, please, don't mindlessly vanalize Wikipedia. Indiawilliams 04:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy and Strong Delete no reason to drag this one out, per WP:SNOW. SkerHawx 03:03, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.