Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Icatch media production

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 17:53, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Icatch media production

They hope to "soon enter the mainstream market." When they do, maybe they can afford to buy adspace somewhere else. Opabinia regalis 04:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment: This nomination does not list a specific reason under Wikipedia:Deletion policy for this nomination. Nominator: please clarify this nomination with specific reasons per DP. Georgewilliamherbert 10:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Wow, you're serious. WP:SPAM, WP:CORP, WP:WEB, WP:NOT (a crystal ball), and probably WP:VAIN given the creator's lack of other contributions. Opabinia regalis 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as proposed. Gazpacho 05:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 05:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 07:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:CORP. Luna Santin 10:40, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. Artw 14:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 17:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.