Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ian Newport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ian Newport

Ian Newport (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable unsuccessful barrister and (very) minor political figure. Seemingly has never held an elected office. Page recently created, seemingly as a vanity/self-advertisement exercise- see hist. Badgerpatrol 11:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nominator. Creating this page was Mr. Newport's one and only edit. Badgerpatrol 11:44, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nomination (WP:N)--Tikiwont 12:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The JPS^{talk to me} 12:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons. Bencherlite 20:16, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete minor apparatchik, and per WP:CRYSTAL, WP:COI and WP:SOAP. Ohconfucius 09:30, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Further proof that the nominator is an ill-informed individual who makes petty personal attacks (for which he has no evidence; how do you know he isn't successful?) whilst maintaining a politically-biased agenda. Richardbooth 02:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• He is unsuccessful in the sense that there is no way that a minor barrister working in a provincial set outside London is ever going to be notable enough to appear in Wikipedia, ceteris paribus. Once again- if you are chucking around allegations that I have some kind of political bias, please provide some EVIDENCE. Otherwise- retract your accusations, please. As for the articles themselves- you'd do well to stop launching personal attacks against me and instead start demonstrating just how the inclusion of any of these fits with Wikipedia policies. Badgerpatrol 09:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.